Piauiense · Jan 19, 2022 23:00

Santos
PWR 54

Parnahyba
PWR 35

Santos
PWR 54
3 - 0
FT

Parnahyba
PWR 35
52% H
24% D
24% A
Final Verdict
ELITE: Santos to win (95% confidence)
Prediction
1-0
Score
95%
Confidence
ELITE
Match Analyzer ELITE
Match Analyzer ELITE
Most Likely Scores:
1-0 (12%)
2-0 (11%)
1-1 (11%)
2-1 (10%)
3-0 (7%)
0-0 (7%)
1X2SKIP
Over/UnderUNDER_25
BTTSBTTS_NO
LOST - Actual: 3-0
Stability Protocol
SKIP · 2 rules · 71%DecisionSKIP
OutcomeHOME
Draw Risk29%
Accuracy42%
AWAY_WEAK_RATEHOME_TOP_POSITION
AH: AH -0.25 - Best line (65% avg across 10 backtests)
AH_025
Standings data available (Tier 2)⚠️ SAME_TIER: Close positions, 28.4% draw rateClose positions = higher draw riskHigh draw risk (29.4%) - consider AHBelow minimum tier (need 4+ rules, got 2)
Power & Form
Attack43
Defense75
Goals/G1.2
Conc/G0.7
Attack0
Defense100
Goals/G0.0
Conc/G0.0
Santos Form
DWWWD
STABLE
Parnahyba Form
LW
STABLE
Score & Markets
Over 2.550%
BTTS50%
Under 2.550%
Santos Goals
0
16%
1
29%
2
27%
3
17%
4
8%
Parnahyba Goals
0
41%
1
37%
2
16%
3
5%
4
1%
Expected Goals (xG)
1.84
Santosvs
0.89
ParnahybaDecision Breakdown
xG_ADV (67.5%)
Player40%
Momentum79%
Standings50%
Market50%
High draw risk (30%) - confidence penalized
League Standings
#2
Santos-1
Gap#1
Parnahyba
WR 44% 31 pts
WR 30% 35 pts
| Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santos | 18 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 22 | 13 | 31 |
| Parnahyba | 27 | 8 | 11 | 8 | 30 | 29 | 35 |
Santos
16.0%
| Nov 28 | Santos v Interna… | 1-1 |
| Nov 10 | Santos v RB Brag… | 2-0 |
| Oct 30 | Santos v Athleti… | 0-1 |
| Oct 27 | Santos v Flumine… | 2-0 |
| Oct 17 | Santos v Sport R… | 0-0 |
| Sep 26 | Santos v Juventu… | 3-0 |
| Sep 15 | Santos v Athleti… | 0-1 |
| Aug 25 | Santos v Athleti… | 1-0 |
| Aug 22 | Santos v Interna… | 2-2 |
| Jul 06 | Santos v Athleti… | 2-1 |
Parnahyba
10.0%
| May 09 | Parnahy… v Santos | 3-1 |
| Nov 18 | Parnahy… v Piauí | 1-0 |
Head-to-Head (1)
| May 09, 2021 | Santos | 3-1 | Parnahyba |
Key Factors
Santos in strong form (3W in last 5)
AI predictions based on historical data. Results may vary.